In Re: The Trial of Obama by Southern Nigerians

In Re: The Trial of Obama by Southern Nigerians

By Aniedobe

 

Following US Rep Scott Perry’s inflammatory allegation that Obama and Biden were funding Boko Haram and other terrorists, a lynch mob of mostly Southern Nigerians have gathered to crucify Barrack Obama.

Between allegedly sponsoring Boko Haram, helping to orchestrate Chibok Girls, and fostering the human disaster called Buhari upon Southern Nigerians, no other evidence of guilt is needed, they insist.

They have hung a heavy cross upon him and are matching him to Golgotha, there to crucify and bury him with the cenotaph: “Gay Lova, Brothers hater.”

I come neither to defend him nor to prosecute him, but to ask for a fair trial. The evil that men do lives after them.

As US President, Obama had to make decisions after reading no more than 10 lines of Executive Summary. That’s all the time he had and that’s what Presidents do.

He does not know the difference between Mark Azuka and Suleiman Ahmed and the twisted history of British brutal rapacity that forced them into one country.

The Executive Summary before him read: President Jonathan presides over a phenomenally corrupt regime; he is a civil rights abuser perpetrated under an ineffectual guise of fighting terrorists; and we have evidence that civil war will break out if he is not removed from power, and millions will likely die in the war.

Before you continue, take a moment to cogitate on the aforesaid Executive Summary and put yourself in Obama’s shoes.

Barrack turned to his Secretary of State and asked:

Is President Jonathan as corrupt as they say? John Kerry: Yes. We have evidence of primitive and ear tingling graft by his ministers and top military personnel and his oil subsidy program has been a monumental scam. In short there is looting of historical magnitude going on in that regime at a scale never seen before.

And how about security in his country, is he able to deal with terrorists. John Kerry: We have evidence of widespread insurgencies in his country and his high handedness in dealing with them has further alienated sections of his country. We have seen heinous human rights abuses in video tapes of his Civilian Joint Task Force under a certain General Ihejirika and we are getting reports that rather than fighting insurgencies, there is underhanded genocide of Northern Nigerian Youths and lacking support of locals, it is unlikely that he can contain terrorist activities that are ravaging his country.

And what about the prospects of Civil War? John Kerry: We have solid evidence that a group in Northern Nigeria is amassing conventional weapons and is intent on going to war if Jonathan is not removed. Their assessment is that his insurgency fighting efforts is revenge killings in disguise. We believe that civil war and collapse of that country is imminent if Jonathan is not forced out.

And what are our allies saying about the situation? John Kerry: Britain has cautioned that the threat of civil war is real and the only way to avoid that regional disaster is to replace him with a Northerner.

And do we have such a Northerner? John Kerry: Yes. There is a certain ex-military dictator who has a track record of fighting corruption, and who appears more capable of dealing with the insurgents mostly from his part of the country. We also have reasons to believe that the threat of civil war will be averted if he is brought back to power.

Then President Obama turns to his trusted aid: David Axlerod, do you agree with Senator Kerry’s assessment of the situation in Nigeria? Axlerod: Yes sir. I am in close contact with the Northern oligarchs and I believe that the best way to preserve democracy in Nigeria is to drum up support for a regime change by making President Jonathan appear incompetent and ineffectual.

 

How about the interest of our allies: David Axlerod:  I should add that keeping Nigeria divided with a Northerner at the helms is in the best interest of our allies and the person at the helms should be docile, fatuous, and willing to preserve colonial interests.

 

Okay David. You know that I am big on democracy. Let’s make sure that Nigerians themselves reject President Jonathan in the ballot box or get him to concede.

 

Axlerod: Yes Sir.

John Kerry: Yes Sir.

 

And the rest is history. Chibok girls was orchestrated to make Jonathan look terrible on handling Boko Haram

as evidence now shows.

Nigeria’s economy was hit in 2014 with abrupt cessation of patronage of Nigerian crude by the West with intent to reverse all the gains the economy made under Jonathan.

John Kerry purposely humiliated Southern Nigerians and Jonathan in his State dalliance with only Northern leaders in order to perpetuate the divide and rule playbook of colonial masters.

Buhari was handed a play script to keep assuring Nigerians and the world that he would end petroleum subsidy, stop corruption, and end Boko Haram in 2 months.

 

Jonathan was harassed into submission with the famous words: My ambitions is not worth the blood of Nigerians. Jonathan was referring to the threatened civil war.

 

Ignore Scott Perry. Obama and Biden may be ultraliberal but they are not demonic and would not knowingly fund terrorists.

 

As for so touted Obama-Jonathan’s disaffection for refusal to pursue Obama’s gay agenda, please give Obama the benefit of commonsense. He would not seek to replace the liberal Jonathan with the fundamentalist Buhari with hope to advance his liberal agenda. LGBT had nothing to do with it.

 

In conclusion: We say that both the knife and he who welded it share culpability in a murder case. So, I ask you to reconsider and do manifest justice. If Obama is the knife, the guilty party is still fellow Nigerians from a section of the country who are vested in advancing the interest of colonial masters. Restructure that country or disband it. For too long has it been the toy of Western powers

 

I rest my case.

Feb 16, 2025

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *